top of page
FinishedTheaterFromBackRight.jpg

In-Room Acoustics

As I tackled my home theater design, I realized that in-room acoustics for the home theater could be quite complicated. While hiring a professional acoustician would have been ideal, I relied on some general guidelines from several experts, as noted in the references. This section highlights the basic background information I used and the resulting design. If you notice anything off or confusing, please let me know!

In-Room Acoustics Considerations

InRoomAcoustics

Last Updated: 03/02/2025

For a professional installation (which this is definitely not), a quality acoustical design would typically involve hiring an acoustician who would ideally create and run detailed simulations of the room to model the results and arrive at the optimal design. Since I wasn't prepared to hire someone or run these acoustical simulations, I opted for the next best approach: reviewing technical information, recommendations from several experts, and insights from well-regarded audio websites. This information was then used to design the room's acoustical elements.

​​

In this section, I'll summarize the primary considerations gathered from the research, as mentioned earlier, and then discuss the design decisions for the theater room. Some tradeoffs were made, which impacted room acoustics. At some point, measurements are needed to assess the results of these tradeoffs and identify the required tweaks, but to date, I have not been motivated to gather this data.

​​​

The main objectives for the room's audio performance goals are summarized as follows:

​​

  1. Clear, intelligible dialog

  2. Precise sound localization

  3. Seamless sound movement around the room

  4. Reproduce accurate and even tonal balance with full dynamics

  5. The audio experience is consistent for primary seating positions

​

A small room is not an ideal environment for audio reproduction. The room itself creates some distortions that "muddle" the audio. Designing the acoustics within the room aims to fix this. A small room with highly reflective walls (e.g., typical drywall) suffers from several "distortions" to the audio that should be addressed. Some of these are:

​​

  • General Reverberation consists of sound bouncing around multiple closely spaced reflections on the room's boundaries.

  • Lateral reflections are typically sidewall reflections that create perceived phantom sources.

  • Early reflections reach the listener shortly after the originating sound (typically <15ms), which confuses the brain; many lateral reflections are also early reflections.

  • Standing waves, also called room modes, create a very uneven frequency response that varies with location within the room. This is most pronounced in the lower frequencies.

 

Breaking the problem (and the room) into two based on sound frequency ranges is helpful when addressing these issues.   In the lower frequencies, the dominating issue is room modes. In the upper-frequency range, the primary distortions are reverberation and reflections. The dividing line (actual frequency) between these two regions is called the Room's Transition Frequency or Schroeder Frequency. (There is a third frequency region called the transition region, the first 2 octaves above the Transition Frequency where both room modes and reverberation are significant). The transition frequency depends on room size (and reverberation time); a typical home theater-sized room is roughly 200-300Hz.  

 

During the room design phase, the tools available to address audio issues are:

​

  1. Sound absorption—Material placed on walls that absorbs reflections, such as fiberglass or mineral wool.

  2. Sound diffusion—An object (usually a panel) affixed to a wall to break up a reflection and scatter it in many directions.

  3. Speaker placement—Typically most effective for the subwoofer because the positions of all other speakers are well-defined (e.g., Dolby).

​

Addressing Reverberation

​

An initial concern to address is controlling (reducing) the overall reverberation in this room. The human auditory system anticipates some reflections; thus, completely removing them is undesirable. Reverberation time reduction can typically be accomplished by applying absorptive materials to the room's walls and ceiling. Ideally, these materials should absorb the entire frequency spectrum. However, addressing the lower frequencies requires thicker and more expensive absorbers. Another acoustical treatment, diffusion, can break up and disperse reflections and improve the sound. As discussed later, diffusion has not been used in this room.

​​

Reflection delay time (RdT), similar to RT60, is a specification used to quantify the amount of reverberation. It is used in acoustics and home theater design to quantify reverberation time (see Figure 1). It specifically refers to the time it takes for sound in a room to decay by 60 decibels after the source has stopped.

​

Studies have been conducted to determine the optimal amount of reverberation. (although there is some conflicting information on this). An RdT between 0.2 to 0.5 seconds is recommended in a typical home theater for good audio intelligibility and generally pleasing sound. Accurately calculating the number of absorbent materials needed to achieve this value can be difficult. It is possible to calculate RdT approximately based on the room's surface area and the amount of absorption. This is a complex, approximate calculation, so I relied on general guidelines to estimate the overall absorption needed for this room to achieve a reasonable RdT.   From this, the number of panels can be calculated.  

​​​​​​​

A graph illustrating the concept of the RT60 home theater acoustical specification.

Figure 1. Waveforms for the Definition of RT60.

 

The following recommendations were used to estimate the acoustic treatments needed.

​​

  • Amount of absorption: ~15% of total wall and ceiling area.

    • Distributed evenly around the room

    • Vertically place 1-1.5 ft. above to 1-1.5 ft. below ear level

    • 1" Panel works down to ~1KHz

    • 2" Panel works down to ~500Hz

    • 4" Panel works down to ~250Hz

    • An airgap behind a 2/4" panel nearly halves the effective frequency

    • Ideally, include Bass absorption, too​

    • Carpet is not a great absorber; it typically absorbs frequencies >1KHz

  • Diffusion: 15-20% of surface area

    • Interleaved with absorption

    • 2D diffusers in front of the room; 3D in back

    • Improves spaciousness and has a small impact on RdT times.

​

​​Using the above guidelines, the amount of needed absorption can be calculated by first calculating the room's surface area, which is:

​

2 x (17.25 x 8) + 2 x (13.3 x 8) + (17.25 x 13.3) = 718 sq. ft.

​

Then the absorption (and diffusion) panel area is 15% of the above:

​

15 % x 720 = 108 sq. ft.  or ~14 panels (2 ft. x 4 ft.)

​

For absorption panels, a 4-inch panel (or a 2-inch panel with a 2-inch airgap) is very effective, but I (suboptimally) used 2-inch panels and later added a few 4-inch panels. The implementation of bass traps was (and is) postponed due to space and floorplan constraints.  â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹Figure 2 below shows a couple of panels used in this theater room.

​

A black rectangular acoustic panel which is 2 ft wide and 4 ft tall.
A black square acoustical panel. 24" x 24"

Figure 2. Two Examples of Black Acoustic Panels. 24 x 24 inch (left) and 24 x 48 inch (right)

Minimal Consideration for Diffusion

​​

The use of diffusion panels for small rooms seems debatable among "experts." Diffusion panels are intended to aid in "sound imaging" within a room by more naturally dispersing reflections, yet they may not significantly affect the RdT time. Some of the available Information also indicates that the benefits are greater for larger home theater rooms. This information, coupled with the generally higher cost of diffusion panels, led to the decision to omit them until measurements could be made.​​

​

Top-down floorplan view of a room showing several types of sound reflections.

Figure 3. Some important early reflections to consider.

Addressing Reflections

​

Having determined the overall amount of absorption to place in the theater, specific reflections can be mitigated by the placement locations of these absorption panels. The most significant reflections typically originate from the front left, center, and right speakers. The order of priority to address these are:

​

  1. Backwall reflections—The sound comes mainly from the front speakers, which bounce off the back wall and return to the listener. However, the sound is delayed by a few milliseconds and will interfere with the sound directly from the speakers.

  2. Front wall reflections— These reflections mix with the direct sound, potentially distorting the frequency response, usually at the higher frequencies.

  3. Sidewall first reflection—Sound from the front left/right speakers bounces off the side walls again, ending at the listener, delayed by a few milliseconds. (Note: Some recommendations prioritize addressing sidewall reflections, but others state that doing so alters the frequency response of the reflection relative to the direct sound from the speaker and that it is more desirable (to the listener) not to alter the combined speaker's and reflections' frequency response.) 

  4. Ceiling first reflection—This is the exact reflection type as the sidewall first reflection, except the sound bounces off the ceiling. This reflection is not shown in Figure 3 above. There could also be a floor-first reflection, which the carpet can partially absorb and, for this theater, is diffused by the first row.

​​​

​Based on all the above information and with a priority to achieve an adequate total panel area, a simple plan for placing acoustic panels was created, as shown in Figure 4 below. A few locations did not receive a panel, and these are noted in the diagram. As mentioned elsewhere, 4-inch-deep panels were thought to take up too much room and were initially going to be 2-inch-thick panels, but later on, they were switched to 4-inch-thick panels.  

​

Another surface area to consider for room acoustics is the floor. Typically, acoustic treatment of the floor is difficult. What is generally recommended is covering the first reflection points, if not the whole floor, with carpet and a thick felt underlayment pad. Doing so will add some attenuation to upper-mid and higher frequencies. This is the only treatment I did in this room. 

​

A top-down room view shows the planned placement of absorption panels in this home theater.

Figure 4. Plan for Absorption Panel Placement.

Possible Enhancements

 

The original estimated RdT times were around 600 milliseconds, slightly missing the target. Later, after the room was built, I measured RT60 using REW, and the result was an RT60 around 250-300 milliseconds above 100Hz. If I needed to try to improve this, the first area of improvement would be to increase the number of 4+-inch panels. Panels could be added to the ceiling, which might also help with ceiling reflections. 

​

Recently, I measured RT60 to check the estimate. The result was an RT60 around 250-300 milliseconds above 100Hz. Below 100Hz, RT60 ramped up to 600 milliseconds as frequency decreased to 20Hz. This result was obviously better than I obtained from my original estimates.  

​

Side Note: Acoustic Panel Ceiling Mount

​

The ceiling-mount panel was not installed initially. One option considered was a "cloud" installation, which involves hanging a panel via chains or ropes a few inches below the ceiling. This is a relatively easy installation, but doing so in this theater room would have blocked the projector image. For this theater, the panel needs to be flush-mounted to the ceiling.

 

Figure 5 shows a relatively simple approach. This approach uses a French-cleat-like bracket with one ceiling attachment, so less precision is required to line up the panel brackets with the ceiling brackets. This solution uses a single ceiling bracket which should be screwed into a joist, after the two panel brackets have been appropriately spaced and screwed to the panel.

​​​​

Drawing of a French cleat-like bracket that can be used to mount a ceiling panel

Figure 5. Ceiling Mount for Acoustic Panel.

Helpful Online Acoustical References

​

Below are some additional sources of acoustical information that I have found helpful:

​

  1. gikacoustics.com—Acoustical panels and information and a Panel Calculator.

  2.  atsacoustics.com—DIY panel components.

  3. Acoustimac.com—More acoustical information.

  4. auralexchange.com—Absorption coefficients.

  5. Transition frequency, aka Schroeder frequency.

  6. audioholics.com—An article on acoustic treatments

  7. sonitususa.com—Room treatment guidelines—.

  8. Toole, Floyd Sound Reproduction: The Acoustics and Psychoacoustics of Loudspeakers and Rooms, Routledge 3rd edition, 2017 (supplementary website) (Amazon Link)

  9. Floyd Toole—Sound reproduction – art and science/opinions and facts— (YouTube video)

  10. AVS Forum Tech Talk with Scott Wilkinson Episode 17: Anthony Grimani Acoustic Treatments VS. EQ –(YouTube Video)

  11. AES PNW June 2023: "Old Problems, New Solutions: Architectural Acoustics in Flux, Redux" --Ron Sauro (YouTube video)

  12. RT60—A Calculator that estimates a room's RT60.

  13. Panel Estimation—AVS Forum Informative thread on room acoustics. 

​

  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Bluesky-Logo_Icon
  • Facebook

(Not all social media links are set up yet)

Website Footer Logo for LNWAKEY.COM

GENERAL DISCLAIMER:

The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only. All content is provided in good faith, however, we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the site. The DIY projects and advice provided on this website are based on personal experience and should not be considered professional advice. Always exercise caution and consult with a professional if you are unsure about any aspect of your project. This website may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by or in any way affiliated with us. Please note that we do not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.

bottom of page